Ballot design — to promote a de-centralized, 50-state, grassroots “election protection” network of groups and individuals working against voter suppression, and for voting rights including:
Audits
Next to full hand-counts, risk-limiting audits offer the most confidence in assessing the accuracy of the election results reported by machine tallies.
Problem:  Need to be performed routinely, timely, and cost-effectively
Solution:  Implementation with paper ballots & rigorous chain of custody.
Chain of custody — to promote a de-centralized, 50-state, grassroots “election protection” network of groups and individuals working against voter suppression, and for voting rights including:
Hand-marked paper ballots — to promote a de-centralized, 50-state, grassroots “election protection” network of groups and individuals working against voter suppression, and for voting rights including:
Voter ID — to promote a de-centralized, 50-state, grassroots “election protection” network of groups and individuals working against voter suppression, and for voting rights including: 

Problem:  Discriminatory
Solution:  Automatic voter registration for all eligible voters
Voter registration — to promote a de-centralized, 50-state, grassroots “election protection” network of groups and individuals working against voter suppression, and for voting rights including:

Page under construction — check back soon for links to resources on listed topics

Please join our email list on Home Page &/or send suggestions to info@electionintegritycaucus.us

Voting Technology — “Voting technologies have developed in parallel with advances in information processing technology. Paper ballots were the only means of voting until the late 1800s, when automation began to be used to assist in counting votes. Nowadays, almost all ballots in the U.S. are counted using computer-assisted technologies.”
— https://electionlab.mit.edu/research/voting-technologyhttps://electionlab.mit.edu/research/voting-technologyshapeimage_9_link_0